{"id":6037,"date":"2023-12-16T20:14:08","date_gmt":"2023-12-17T02:14:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/toxinfreeusa.org\/?p=6037"},"modified":"2023-12-18T20:21:37","modified_gmt":"2023-12-19T02:21:37","slug":"what-is-greenwashing-a-guide-with-greenwashing-examples","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/toxinfreeusa.org\/what-is-greenwashing-a-guide-with-greenwashing-examples\/","title":{"rendered":"What is Greenwashing? A Guide with Greenwashing Examples."},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

WHAT IS GREENWASHING?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Merriam-Webster, the definition<\/a> of greenwashing is \u201cthe act or practice of making a product, policy, activity, etc. appear to be more environmentally friendly or less environmentally damaging than it really is.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Corporate greenwashing can take on many forms \u2013 communications through advertising, packaging, public relations, branding; partnerships or affiliations with other organizations or individuals; and corporate charitable giving. On the flip side, greenwashing can also occur when a company doesn\u2019t communicate, withholding information that would reveal its poor practices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

WHY DO CORPORATIONS GREENWASH?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The answer is simple: The purpose of corporate greenwashing is to mislead the public in the interest of increasing sales and improving or preserving profits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Clean food and products that are healthy and environmentally sustainable are a quickly growing<\/a> category of consumer goods, and shoppers will pay higher prices for them. Corporate marketing teams are paid big money to lure these shoppers in. And so, in today\u2019s green marketing practices, almost anything goes. Though there are some consumer protection laws that allow the public to stop misleading marketing<\/a>, false advertising and misrepresentations abound.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EXAMPLES OF GREENWASHING<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

We\u2019ll be examining three companies that most people have heard of \u2013 Whole Foods Market, Kellogg\u2019s, and Bayer-Monsanto \u2013 and walk you through some examples of greenwashing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Exhibit A: Whole Foods Market: Branding, Public Relations, and Advertising<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whole Foods Market is a retailer that has, since its founding, positioned itself as the premiere grocer for natural and organic foods. It has built this reputation over decades. But especially since its acquisition by Amazon, it has arguably pivoted, relying on a kind of insidious greenwashing rather than maintaining its original standards and living up to its branding and corporate marketing communications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whole Foods asserts<\/a> that it\u2019s the \u201cOrganic Capital of the World\u201d and advertises, \u201cWe don\u2019t just put organics on a shelf \u2014 we put them on a pedestal.\u201d Whole Foods also claims on its website and in its 2023 annual Impact Report<\/a> that the company\u2019s purpose is \u201cto nourish people and the planet\u201d and \u201caims to set the standards of excellence for food retailers.\u201d The company claims to \u201csell the highest quality natural and organic foods and to satisfy and delight its customers.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
Whole Foods Market website claiming to be the \u201cOrganic Capital of the World\u201d, 2023.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Whole Foods Greenwashing Example #1<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This summer, if you trotted into the Whole Foods store in Las Vegas, Nevada, to buy some organic sweet corn for your family BBQ, this is what you found\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Let\u2019s have a look at that sign in the corn bin\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\u201cTreat Your Body and The Earth With Kindness. We support organic farmers and other producers who care about pesticide use and soil health when growing their fruits and vegetables,\u201d the sign says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You feel so warm and fuzzy. And you shout, \u201cHoney, I found the organic sweet corn!\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most shoppers would have assumed that the sweet corn in the bin was organic corn, placed the ears in their shopping cart, and rolled away.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But not so fast! You need to take a close look at the sales\/UPC label\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

While the sweet corn in this bin is not GMO, as indicated \u2013 \u201cDoes Not Contain any Bioengineered Ingredients\u201d \u2013 it\u2019s definitely not organic, as denoted by the fine print stating, \u201cconventional.\u201d Conventional corn is the only corn being sold at this store. Anyone not reading and understanding the fine print has just been duped.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whole Foods Greenwashing Example #2<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now, let\u2019s hop on over to a store in Avon, Connecticut, where you\u2019ll see this sign hanging prominently above your head.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe sell the highest quality<\/em> natural and organic food,\u201d the sign says. Organic signs are everywhere. You say, \u201cGreat, I\u2019m in the right place!\u201d So let\u2019s go find that organic sweet corn for the BBQ.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Found the sweet corn\u2026 but again, if you read the fine print, which most people wouldn\u2019t, you\u2019ll see it says, \u201cBioengineered Food.\u201d This is the new term concocted by the GMO industry and the USDA that means GMO, but one that most consumers aren\u2019t yet familiar with.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Shockingly, in this Avon, Connecticut, store, this is the only sweet corn available. No organic. Not even conventional, non-GMO corn. The only corn featured here is toxic, insecticide-producing, herbicide-tolerant GMO corn that was created in a lab. GMO corn  is not natural.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How is this putting \u201corganics\u2026 on a pedestal\u201d as Whole Foods so proudly claims?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whole Foods Greenwashing Example #3<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Go West, young man.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Don\u2019t mind if we do. Let\u2019s head over to the Evergreen State and find some sweet corn for our BBQ.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

In this Redmond, Washington, Whole Foods store, we actually have two options.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bin on the left contains \u201cOrganic Bi-Color Corn.\u201d The bin on the right contains \u201cBi-Color Corn.\u201d Whole Foods shoppers have already been conditioned by advertising, corporate branding, and in-store signage to expect only natural and organic foods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But again, look very closely at the sign on the right and there is a tiny disclosure that the corn is \u201cbioengineered.\u201d If you\u2019ve already forgotten, bioengineered means genetically engineered, or GMO.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

A person with poor eyesight (like the author of this article) wouldn\u2019t even be able to read the tiny \u201cbioengineered\u201d disclosure on the signage. If Whole Foods was transparent and forthright, the sign in that bin should read, \u201cGMO Bi-Color Corn,\u201d in large letters, treated in the same way as the Organic Bi-Color Corn sign.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Surprisingly, Whole Foods was selling the GMO sweet corn at prices even higher than non-GMO sweet corn sold at Walmart. Organic foods tend to be the most expensive, followed by non-GMO foods. GMO foods, which are highly subsidized by taxpayers in the U.S, are cheapest. Price-conscious Whole Foods shoppers may decide to buy conventional over organic, but they wouldn\u2019t expect the conventional produce to be GMO.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bait and switch: Before its acquisition by Amazon and as an independent company, Whole Foods would have never carried fresh produce that is genetically engineered, as its long-time customers and target market would have found this inappropriate and objectionable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the past, Whole Foods\u2019 nickname, \u201cWhole Paycheck,\u201d was tenable because of the company\u2019s commitment to certified organic foods. But Whole Paycheck for GMO foods is greenwashing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Exhibit B: Kellogg\u2019s: Packaging and Partnerships\/Affiliations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kellogg\u2019s has recently broken<\/a> into two separate companies, Kellanova and Kellogg. But we\u2019ll refer to them as Kellogg\u2019s in this article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kellogg\u2019s Greenwashing Example #1<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cHealthwashing\u201d isn\u2019t yet a word, so we\u2019ve decided to include examples of this as a subcategory of greenwashing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

No person on Earth should be even remotely convinced that Kellogg\u2019s Froot Loops cereal is healthy. Yet, some people would be led to believe that this ultra-processed junk food has some redeeming characteristics by what\u2019s printed on the box.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The packaging says, \u201cGood Source of FIBER & Made with WHOLE GRAIN.\u201d All caps. Wow, there must be a LOT of fiber and whole grains in there. And \u201cNatural Fruit Flavors\u201d, too. Kellogg\u2019s advertising of Froot Loops also says, \u201cStart your day on the right foot with breakfast cereal bursting with fruity flavor, delicious for kids and adults.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you look at the ingredients list, you\u2019ll see the product is primarily made of sugar and the bright colors created using artificial, petroleum-based food dyes. This, and most of Kellogg\u2019s cereals targeting children, are far from natural or healthy, so much so that the government of Mexico has enacted<\/a> food packaging regulations forcing manufacturers to put front-of-package warning labels to educate consumers about things like excess sugar and fat. Mexico has also banned the use of mascots like Toucan Sam and Tony the Tiger for unhealthy junk food.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But instead of making healthier food, Kellogg\u2019s has sued the Mexican government and launched a propaganda campaign to turn the Mexican public against the labeling policy. All while our own FDA says<\/a> that foods with more than 2.5g of added sugar are \u201cnot healthy,\u201d but no disclosure is required. Froot Loops contains 12g of added sugar!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kellogg\u2019s Greenwashing Example #2<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Using actors and athletes to sell junk food is nothing new. But it\u2019s still an effective form of greenwashing. If those actors and sports figures look so beautiful and healthy, it must be the food, right?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Below, we have dancer and actor, Allison Holker, hawking Frosted Mini-Wheats. Just like the Froot Loops box, Holker is pitching the fiber content. But what she doesn\u2019t say is that Frosted Mini-Wheats contains an unhealthy amount of sugar, likely genetically engineered, and is made of conventional wheat, likely desiccated with the toxic herbicide glyphosate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For the record, our own Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will tell you that Kellogg\u2019s Frosted Mini Wheats are \u201cnot healthy.\u201d The product contains 12g of added sugar, well above the FDA\u2019s healthy cutoff level of 2.5g.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Holker says, \u201cJust add milk and fruit.\u201d Really? You\u2019re better off eating only the fruit and dropping that box of Frosted Mini-Wheats into the trash can.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

In more recent years, however, as consumers become more health conscious, Kellogg\u2019s and other food corporations have resorted to even more egregious forms of greenwashing \u2013 paying registered dietitians to hawk their junk food. You would think registered dietitians would have some code of ethics. Not so. There are some that have no ethics whatsoever, as we\u2019ll see.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Below is a sponsored message on Facebook by Kaleigh McMordie, Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (RDN) and founder of the website Lively Table, which purports to give its readers \u201cno-BS nutrition, wellness and healthy living tips.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

McMordie is singing the praises of fiber in Raisin Bran. Fiber is important, but the dietitian fails to tell you that Raisin Bran is also high in added sugar, likely genetically engineered, and is made from conventional wheat, likely desiccated with glyphosate.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Yet another example of bought-and-paid-for greenwashing by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist who calls herself Dietitian Deanna. Again, Frosted Mini-Wheats. Again, trash can. These people are shameless.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Kellogg\u2019s Greenwashing Example #3<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 2020, Kellogg\u2019s announced<\/a> a commitment to phase out the use of glyphosate as a pre-harvest drying agent in its major wheat and oat supply chains by 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pre-harvest drying, also called desiccation, of crops with chemical herbicides such as glyphosate is a common practice among conventional farmers. Although GMO wheat and oats are not currently used in the United States, the practice of desiccation has resulted in even higher levels<\/a> of glyphosate being found in these non-GMO crops than in glyphosate-tolerant GMO crops like corn and soy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So Kellogg\u2019s announcement to phase out the practice of glyphosate desiccation in their supply chains was not only welcome, it was lauded<\/a> and promoted with much positive publicity. News stories characterized the corporation as a \u201cleader\u201d in its field, putting a halo on the company\u2019s head for its effort to protect human health and the environment. All of this positive publicity was free advertising for Kellogg\u2019s, something called \u201cearned media\u201d in the marketing field.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unfortunately, it was all a big lie. Kellogg\u2019s did absolutely nothing since 2020 and as of the writing of this article, has backtracked on its commitment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is often the case with big, multinational corporations. They\u2019ll make a big splash with a promise to do something good. They\u2019ll reap the publicity rewards of that announcement, but setting a date far into the future. When the time comes, they renege on the original promise, as Kellogg\u2019s has done. After so many years have passed, most people forget there was even a promise made. So Kellogg\u2019s experiences no consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But at GMO\/Toxin Free USA, we don\u2019t forget. Which is why we continue to call for a boycott of Kellogg\/Kellanova. It\u2019s still the same lying, greenwashing corporation it was no matter what name it goes by.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Exhibit C: Bayer-Monsanto: Public Relations and Charitable Giving<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Monsanto was arguably the most hated corporation in the world before being acquired<\/a> by Bayer AG in 2018. Though Bayer is most associated with relieving people\u2019s headaches with its aspirin pills, the company also has a very dark underbelly<\/a>. Both companies\u2019 public relations departments had, and still have, their work cut out for them. As a combined company, Bayer-Monsanto uses the same tactics to minimize public criticism and deflect attention away from its harmful products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bayer-Monsanto\u2019s greenwashing list is very long. So we\u2019ll only cover a couple of examples.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bayer Greenwashing Example #1<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This summer, Bayer launched a Monarch butterfly campaign with a local Hawaii organization dedicated to butterflies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Bayer\u2019s website announcement<\/a> reads, \u201cTo raise awareness about the importance of monarch butterflies in agriculture, Bayer Hawaii is partnering again with Sharing the Butterfly Experience for its 6th annual Monarch Butterfly Kit giveaway.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Since 2018, we’ve been able to give away more than 75 monarch butterfly kits across Hawaii. Not only does this create a memorable and educational experience for the winners, it helps raise awareness for the critical role pollinators play in our world, specifically in our food supply,” said Monica Ivey, corporate relations lead for Bayer Hawaii. “It’s a privilege to help others experience these beautiful and extremely valuable creatures while supporting their conservation.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is probably one of the most egregious forms of greenwashing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What Bayer-Monsanto doesn\u2019t tell you is that they produce neonicotinoids<\/a> and glyphosate<\/a>\/Roundup, pesticides widely used in conventional and GMO agriculture. These are products that kill the Monarch butterflies and other important pollinators. Bayer\u2019s pesticides are one of the major causes of the mass biodiversity and species loss of our modern times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To add insult to injury, Bayer has operations in Hawaii where the company experiments<\/a> with GMO seeds and toxic pesticide concoctions, poisoning<\/a> Hawaiians and their land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of you may be aware of these facts. But right now, most people in the world are not. So for Bayer, this exercise in greenwashing is still effective and low-cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bayer Greenwashing Example #2<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Bayer Fund is the corporation’s charitable giving arm. Corporate charitable giving has long been used for multiple reasons. Sometimes to improve public perception – being a good \u201ccorporate citizen.\u201d\u00a0 Sometimes to silence potential criticism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Bayer\u2019s giving is not philanthropy, even though the company publicly states it as such. Bayer strategically doles out millions in cash to nonprofits to help it achieve its corporate goals. Bayer\u2019s primary goal: To make billions and ever-increasing profits for shareholders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Bayer Fund website states<\/a>: \u201cBayer is committed to improving the quality of life for people around the world. Equally important is our commitment to substantially and meaningfully improving people\u2019s lives in the communities in which we and our customers live and work. As a philanthropic arm of Bayer in the United States, Bayer Fund develops programs and makes strategic investments to qualified non-profit organizations tackling big challenges \u2013 combating malnutrition and food insecurity; enhancing STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) education; providing support services for patients and families managing cardiovascular disease and cancer.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That statement really is a sick joke. Bayer poisons people around the world. Is poisoning the people and lands of Hawaii \u201cmeaningfully improving people\u2019s lives in the communities in which we and our customers live and work\u201d? No, it\u2019s quite the opposite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A major and influential nonprofit that Bayer gives to<\/a> is Susan G. Komen. Komen popularized the pink cancer ribbon and the \u201cWalk\/Race for the Cure\u201d and its mission is \u201cto save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities and investing in breakthrough research to prevent and cure breast cancer.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Monsanto was also a corporate sponsor of Komen when it was an independent company. In 2013, Monsanto representatives were handing out Monsanto-branded bandaids during a Komen Walk for the Cure in St. Louis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Monsanto makes Roundup. Roundup causes cancer. Bandaids will not help your cancer. You just can\u2019t make this stuff up.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

You would think an organization like Komen would emphasize cancer prevention. Yet, you\u2019ll be hard-pressed to find much about the risks of toxic pesticides or the roles chemicals can play in causing cancer on the Komen website. In fact, Komen regularly downplays the risks posed by pesticides. Is this a coincidence?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But the truth is beginning to catch up to Bayer-Monsanto and the nonprofits that conceal or minimize the dangers of synthetic pesticides. Bayer has been sued by over 130,000 individuals in the U.S. alleging their Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma was caused by Roundup weedkiller. The science supports these claims and so have juries. Bayer has lost multiple trials<\/a> since 2018, costing the company billions. And there are tens of thousands of trials to go.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How to Spot Greenwashing<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are so many examples of greenwashing that it would be impossible to give an exhaustive list. But here are some tips\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We can all appreciate great design, but don\u2019t be taken in by fancy packaging, or graphics or photos that adorn those packages. That goes for the words printed on the packaging, too. Some words have meaning, most don\u2019t.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Take words such as \u201csimple,\u201d \u201cclean,\u201d \u201cnatural,\u201d \u201call-natural,\u201d \u201c100% natural,\u201d \u201ceco-friendly,\u201d \u201cgreen,\u201d \u201csustainable,\u201d \u201cbiodegradable,\u201d and \u201cplant-based\u201d with a grain of salt. These words are not regulated and can be misleading. Even words like \u201cnon-toxic\u201d and \u201chypoallergenic\u201d can be used freely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beware when a company claims their food\/product is \u201cfree of\u2026\u201d For example, many non-stick, Teflon-coated cookware makers regularly tout their products as \u201cFree of PFOS\u201d or \u201cFree of PFOA,\u201d two toxic PFAS-class chemicals. But what they don\u2019t tell you is that Teflon contains PTFE, which is also a PFAS-class chemical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Also beware of made-up logos and seals intended to fool you into thinking the product has been certified by a trustworthy certifying body.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

How to Avoid Greenwashing<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not every company is out to rip you off. But we always like to say, \u201cTrust, but verify.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you\u2019re shopping for fresh food at the farmers market, you may know the farmer. Maybe you\u2019ve even been able to visit the farm and see that the barn in the farm business\u2019s logo actually exists. And that they\u2019re not spraying pesticides everywhere. That the chickens are actually outside, pecking and scratching at the soil and having a good \u2018ol time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But if you\u2019re shopping in the wild wild west of the supermarket, that\u2019s not possible. Especially for processed foods and consumer products, which are made in factories that may not even be in the state or country in which you live.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The only way to verify is to look for official third-party certifications. This is the surest way to avoid greenwashing and have an assurance that a company\u2019s advertising claims are merited. So learn the labels and do the best you can.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We\u2019ve pictured some of the most trustworthy certifications below, covering food, consumer products, and textiles. The graphic is not an exhaustive list.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

P.S. We\u2019ll be writing a more comprehensive blog about food\/product certifications and what you can expect from those labels, as a companion to this greenwashing blog\u2026 coming soon. Sign up for our emails to be the first to read it. <\/strong>SIGN UP HERE<\/strong><\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Have you spotted greenwashing in the stores or online? Let us know in the comments below!<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WHAT IS GREENWASHING? According to Merriam-Webster, the definition of greenwashing is \u201cthe act or practice of making a product, policy, activity, etc. appear to be more environmentally friendly or less environmentally damaging than it really is.\u201d Corporate greenwashing can take on many forms \u2013 communications through advertising, packaging, public relations, branding; partnerships or affiliations with …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[58],"tags":[],"class_list":{"2":"type-post","6":"category-the-non-toxic-sleuth","7":"entry"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/toxinfreeusa.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6037","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/toxinfreeusa.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/toxinfreeusa.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/toxinfreeusa.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/toxinfreeusa.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6037"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/toxinfreeusa.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6037\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6063,"href":"https:\/\/toxinfreeusa.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6037\/revisions\/6063"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/toxinfreeusa.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/toxinfreeusa.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6037"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/toxinfreeusa.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}